CAID
Christian
                  Aboriginal
                                      Infrastructure
                                                        Developments

 

Featured

Meaningful Consultation in Canada: The Alternative to Forced Aboriginal Assimilation

United Nations’ Recommendations on the Duty to Consult

Arctic Perishable Food Mail Program Review and Recommendations

Amnesty International - Canada: Submission to the UN Universal Periodic Review

Indigenous Children's Health Report: Health Assessment in Action

 

Last Updated September 15, 2015

Wildlife Harvest Management

 

Aboriginal people have lived in relation with the land from time immemorial. Wildlife provided food, tools, and clothing that were used locally and for trading purposes. Today, inherent, treaty, constitutional and international rights guarantee access to the land and its wildlife for local, regional, national and international purposes, whether those purposes be local or as a base to an Aboriginal economy. Non-Aboriginal people become alarmed with talk of indigenous people asserting their right to hunt and fish to the economic benefit of their communities but applaud when non-Aboriginal sport hunters have hunting limits increased. It should be pointed out that Aboriginal people in Canada did not deplete the Grand Banks cod stocks, exhaust the Great Lakes’ fisheries, destroy the Pacific fishery and did not hunt buffalo to the brink of extinction. Every battle lost by wildlife resulting in their depletion anywhere in North America was lost at the hand of colonizing Europeans; non-Aboriginal people. Aboriginal wildlife harvest management defined by traditional Aboriginal law and guidelines never wasted wildlife in the trivial pursuit of wealth or in the name of sport.

 

We have mentioned the need for a northern country food infrastructure to reverse starvation trends in the Arctic. The traditional Aboriginal infrastructure of wildlife harvest management for food and trade was destroyed in Canada by the policy of forced Aboriginal assimilation. As a result, non-Aboriginal people can not see how appropriate and respectful an Aboriginal wildlife harvest management infrastructure is. They assume that reestablished wildlife harvest management and trade would function like their factory fish trawlers, destroying everything caught in its path. This is simply not true. Why does a nuisance bear, killed because it is a danger to a community, have to be thrown into the dump. Why are its fur, meat, gallbladder, and other byproducts not harvested to the economic benefit of an Aboriginal hunter and his community? Exuberant deer populations, rampaging bears and flood-causing beaver populations (as examples) need to be harvest-managed. Aboriginal people (First Nation, Inuit and Métis) have the right to reestablish their wildlife harvest management systems. With an appropriate wildlife veterinary infrastructure upon which a harvest management infrastructure can be built, surplus deer populations, nuisance beaver and dangerous bears can be respectfully harvested and their meat and by-products safely used to support a base economy for impoverished Aboriginal communities. Wildlife harvest management to the economic benefit of Aboriginal people is a step toward reducing poverty, it promotes traditional lifestyles and roles, and supports self-determination.

 

© Christian Aboriginal Infrastructure Developments

Last Updated September 15, 2015